1- If the National Endowment for the Arts – Art in Public Places Program – was designed to teach the public how to appreciate advanced art, how did Richard Serras Tilted Arctest the NEAs assumptions when it was installed in Federal Plaza in Manhattan?

Public art that is, art that exists in public places often generates controversy, the negative reaction to Serras Tilted Arcmakes for an interesting discussion be sure to respond to all three prompts.Im asking you to consider for this discussion post. 2- On which side of the argument about Titled Arcdo you think you would have fallen and why? 3- Has any public art on your campus or in your community stirred similar debate, or at least roused negative sentiments, and what was the outcome of the debate?These links will help you with your discussion topic, provide more clarity in your response to the questions I have posted. I would also suggest you do your own research on this topic as well:
https://www.sfmoma.org/watch/richard-serra-on-trial-for-tilted-arc/https://www.sfmoma.org/artist/Richard_Serra (Links to an external site.)https://www.sfmoma.org/watch/richard-serra-answers-why-make-art/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/cultureshock/flashpoints/visualarts/tiltedarc_a.html